compare / gamma
DeckCP vs Gamma
Fast AI decks, but cards instead of slides — and exports can turn into pictures.
| What you can do | DeckCP | Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| Turn spoken or pasted text into a deck | ||
| Edit slides by voice on your phone | ||
| Drag things exactly where you want them | Cards flow on their own; fine control is limited | |
| Your own AI assistant can build and edit decks | Any assistant that speaks MCP | Its built-in agent only |
| Edit together, live | ||
| Exports stay editable slides | Some layouts export as pictures you can't edit | |
| Brand rules the whole team can't drift from | Themes, not rules |
Based on each product as of July 2026. If we got something wrong, tell us and we'll fix it.
Where Gamma shines
Gamma is fast, and it looks good out of the box. You give it a prompt and it hands back something presentable, and its agent can restyle a whole deck from a sentence. It thinks in scrolling cards rather than fixed slides, which works well for documents that live on the web.
Where DeckCP differs
The trade is control. In Gamma you can't always put things exactly where you want them, font sizes have limits, and when you export to PowerPoint, some layouts come out as pictures instead of editable slides. DeckCP starts from the same speed — talk, get a deck — but keeps you on a real 16:9 canvas where everything snaps to a grid. You can hand the file to someone who only has PowerPoint, and it opens as slides they can edit.
The bottom line
If your deck lives on the web and nobody downstream needs to edit it, Gamma is a fine tool. If the deck has to survive contact with clients, boards, and other people's software, you want real slides. That's DeckCP.
Try it yourself
We let a new batch of people in every week.