compare / google-slides
DeckCP vs Google Slides
Easy to share, hard to make beautiful, impossible to keep on brand.
| What you can do | DeckCP | Google Slides |
|---|---|---|
| Turn spoken or pasted text into a deck | With a Gemini subscription | |
| Edit slides by voice on your phone | ||
| Drag things exactly where you want them | ||
| Your own AI assistant can build and edit decks | Any assistant that speaks MCP | Gemini only |
| Edit together, live | ||
| Exports stay editable slides | ||
| Brand rules the whole team can't drift from | Templates, if people use them |
Based on each product as of July 2026. If we got something wrong, tell us and we'll fix it.
Where Google Slides shines
Slides nailed sharing before anyone else: a link, live cursors, comments, no files. It's free, it's everywhere, and for a quick internal deck it does the job.
Where DeckCP differs
Design is where it runs out of road. The results look like Google Slides — there is a ceiling on how good a deck can look, and keeping a team on brand means hoping people use the template. DeckCP shares and co-edits the same way — live, in the browser, presence avatars and all — but the editor itself enforces your fonts, colors, and logo. Nobody can drift off brand, because the tool won't let them. And the copilot means the first draft takes minutes, not a meeting.
The bottom line
Keep Slides for the quick internal stuff if you like. When the deck is going in front of people who matter, DeckCP gets you the polish without giving up the live-editing workflow your team already expects.
Try it yourself
We let a new batch of people in every week.